|
1) Authorship/Affiliation
-
Is the author's name listed?
-
What are his/her credentials? Do these identify him/her as
an authority in the field?
-
Is his/her institutional affiliation listed and a link to
the home page of that institution given? Is the relationship
between the institution and the author clear?
-
Does the author list his e-mail and/or snail mail address?
Is a phone number listed?
-
Is there a link to his/her biographical information?
General comments: The authority is often difficult to determine.
Many times the list of qualifications is absent and no link available
to a home page. On the web, the home page is the sponsor (publisher
in the traditional setting).
2) Accuracy
-
Is the information reliable and free from errors?
-
Is a bibliography included to verify the information?
-
Is it clear who is responsible for the accuracy of the material?
-
Are there links to other reliable resources?
-
If statistical material is included, are the sources for these
materials clearly stated?
General comments: Anyone can publish a web page. At this point
there are no web standards and no type of control is in place.
3) Objectivity
-
Is the information presented with the least possible bias?
-
Is the site factual or does the author try to change the user's
mind?
-
Is imagery used to sway the opinion of the user?
General comments: Web pages seldom state the goal/aim of the author.
Many times a web page is only a sounding board for a person. Advertisement
on web pages should be clearly differentiated from the actual information
content.
4) Currency
-
Is the date of the latest revision of the web site clearly
stated?
-
Is the date given at which the information was gathered?
-
Is the page kept current?
-
Are the links current, i.e. do they work?
-
If applicable: is this truly the latest information on the
topic?
5) Coverage
-
Is the scope of the topic clearly stated?
-
Is the site comprehensive?
-
Are supporting materials given, i.e. bibliography, charts
and/or graphics?
-
Are there links to other resources of the topic?
-
Is the site still under construction?
General comments: It is difficult to determine the coverage of
a web site. One often has to browse around in a given resource
to guess at the extent of coverage.
6) Other factors to consider regarding
web sites:
-
Do the graphics/arts serve a purpose or are they strictly
decorative?
-
Do the icons show what they represent?
-
Is encryption provided for private information?
-
Are the lines between information and advertisement distinct?
-
Do the linked pages differ in quality from the original page?
-
Does the site provide direct links to the cited documents?
-
Is special software needed to access the information?
-
Is the site easy to navigate? i.e. are the frames clearly
outlined and workable?
-
Always examine the URL. The domain gives you information about
the authority of the source. (.edu; .com; .org.; .gov; .....)
It will tell you if the institution has a stake in the information.
-
Can you contact the Webmaster via e-mail?
Other Web Evaluation Sites
Evaluating Internet
Research Resources - a detailed guide to evaluating web sites.
The guide was done by Robert Harris from Southern California
College.
|